Price Suggestion
~3.33 ref
Unique Reader's Choice
50
votes
up
35 votes down
This suggestion was marked as bad price range and closed
by Mindacos.
The price range was either too broad or did not accurately reflect how the item was traded.
Therefore, this suggestion has been closed.
Message left by moderator:
Buyers at 1.55 counter 1.44 being in a range. Resuggest using a concrete sale(not a quickbuy from a bot), and use that as a flat value.
Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.
How has this not been changed yet?
Look at those sales and buy offers!
http://imgur.com/a/WCLuA
Where is 1.66 coming from if there's sellers for 1.33-1.55
There is a buyer that is buying multiple at 1.55, which makes the value higher, right?
Yea, but there's sellers lower than buyers (idk why people do that but whatever)
That is why I kept the radius fairly wide. 2.6 is deff. not the price. That has to be changed.
I just looked at classifieds again, the one for 1.33 sold
1.33 is a great deal on something that is valued at 2.6
You need actual trades that are accepted to make a unpriced - priced suggestion
The only reason why this hat is 2.6 ref is because that's the price on the market, which is invalid pricing and proof
This doesn't have a backpack.tf price, and therefore, this is an unpriced - priced suggestion
Downvote
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198102996762#!/compare/1484697600/1484784000
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198324473963#!/compare/1484611200/1484697600
Something like this..?