This suggestion was marked as bad price range and closed
by Vijf Kilo Boter (met voetjes).
The price range was either too broad or did not accurately reflect how the item was traded.
Therefore, this suggestion has been closed.
Message left by moderator:
The last suggestion on this (accepted 5 days ago) already ruled out 105 as high outlier. K1ngs comments on both this and the last accepted suggestion are the most solid reasons why that's the case. Before you can update this, you'll need to wait for it to sell again.
Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.
Yes, the ubersternmann sale, it's being used to price the ubersternmann and can't be used here.
This should be placed at flat 105 and the 1:1 used to price the uber.
See comment on last accepted suggestion. What he forgot to mention is that it also sold for 62 keys, as did the uberstern.
The Uber did not sell for 62 keys, all offers on the guys trade says otherwise, I even offered the guy 65, he was also offered 77 as the most recent offer on his trade, if he sold for 62 it was a desperate quicksell if anything, as I would have paid that in a heartbeat. (and I already got one for christ sake)
62 is the outlier here, not 105.
well, the uberstern may not be updatable in this case (your suggestion is too high, the offers on that hat you use to call 65 an outlier wason a hat that was unsold at 85 for 9 whole months, so the high end sales are outliers as well).
This has been unsold a 70 for quite a while, and the cracker sale had a BO of 70 before the suggestion was made. Both current sellers were willing to take 70 until they made that suggestion.
There's no reason to include 105 here
105 is a more valid point than 62, all offers indicate it's too low.
But offers also indicate 105 is too high, plus what foamy just explained (unsold for 9 months at 85). show this hat is just not priceable.
You might as well want to not be so vulgar in the counter suggestion.
I'll be vulgar against people that keep killing my unusuals with shitty sales that do not reflect the price or what someone would pay at all.
Never occured to you people can make mistakes?
Mindacos isn't like "huehuehue, I'm gonna drop Hex's backpack for pleasure". He did a suggestion wrongly, as everyone does. You're the first to do mistakes when it comes to deciding what is an outlier and when it comes to assessing a suggestion, no offense intended, it's just what happened, as we have seen multiple times in the past, and I don't think you would want anyone to be vulgar against you for that.
Be as vulgar as you want, don't care what people think or say about me, but touch my backpack, and i'll mess you up fam.
You sure as hell take all of that far too seriously and personnaly. Who actually cares about the backpack value, it's merely an indicator, and considering your wealth, a few keys off wouldn't suddendly make you "poor" (stressing on the ")
Sorry all for going off topic by the way, but this rage sure needs to be adressed somewhere. ^_^
Well Im mostly commenting on this suggestion (which is the rancho), where 105 shouldnt be included. I only mentioned the uberstern because you started about that
Completely aware of what suggestion you are commenting on, on either end, 62 is low, 105 may be high, but a much more valid price point than 62.
Inb4 -1, because having an opinion that doesn't match the one of others, although it is more valid than what they are spewing out, is illegal on this site.
I'm not downvoting you because you're wrong.
I'm downvoting you because you're being rude.
You must be all too familiar with that Gent.
Hypocrite.
Why is it more valid though? it would help if you give a reason why 105 is more valid than 62 here.
Darn, i'm late to the party.
Regarding the Ubersternmann: 62 is obviously low, but 100-105 is obviously high.
- The Whirlwind Rancho is nowhere near 105 as i have pointed out in previous suggestions ( http://backpack.tf/vote/id/56e1c5e3b98d885535283001 ). The sale for the D@D Ubersternmann should be an outlier as well, as the owner was specifically looking for a Rancho ( http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27915705 ), he probably would have done a 1:1 with a Silver Cyclone one (priced at 55) as he had it listed there.
- As Foamy pointed out, the seller you use to prove that 62 is low had a pure B/O of 85 keys (comments here: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25992083 ), and couldn't sell it for that amount.
So i'm afraid it will be better to leave the Ubersternmann outdated and wait for more sales, unless you want to suggest it at 85 with a conservative B/O drop.
downvotting this.... the range its to big.
You're forgetting that the Rancho itself also sold for 62 Keys pure
When i bought the Rancho for the Ubersternman, the price of the Ubersternman (94 keys) was still valid. If this doesnt help, then let me know and ill hide this comment
ITEM - http://backpack.tf/item/4217138440
1 SELL : Seller - http://steamcommunity.com/id/funkster
I buyer - for Silver Cyclone Taunt: Skullcracker (90 keys + 15 keys pure)
https://yadi.sk/i/2DRmeRT_ps537
http://backpack.tf/stats/Unusual/Taunt%3A%20Skullcracker/Tradable/Craftable/3009
2 SELL - for Death at Dusk Das Ubersternmann - 62 keys
http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198173872595/#!/compare/1456992000/1457251200
The Range is too big :/
One of the Sales has to be an outliner
Yes, the ubersternmann sale, it's being used to price the ubersternmann and can't be used here.
This should be placed at flat 105 and the 1:1 used to price the uber.
See comment on last accepted suggestion. What he forgot to mention is that it also sold for 62 keys, as did the uberstern.
The Uber did not sell for 62 keys, all offers on the guys trade says otherwise, I even offered the guy 65, he was also offered 77 as the most recent offer on his trade, if he sold for 62 it was a desperate quicksell if anything, as I would have paid that in a heartbeat. (and I already got one for christ sake)
62 is the outlier here, not 105.
well, the uberstern may not be updatable in this case (your suggestion is too high, the offers on that hat you use to call 65 an outlier wason a hat that was unsold at 85 for 9 whole months, so the high end sales are outliers as well).
This has been unsold a 70 for quite a while, and the cracker sale had a BO of 70 before the suggestion was made. Both current sellers were willing to take 70 until they made that suggestion.
There's no reason to include 105 here
105 is a more valid point than 62, all offers indicate it's too low.
But offers also indicate 105 is too high, plus what foamy just explained (unsold for 9 months at 85). show this hat is just not priceable.
You might as well want to not be so vulgar in the counter suggestion.
Well Im mostly commenting on this suggestion (which is the rancho), where 105 shouldnt be included. I only mentioned the uberstern because you started about that
Completely aware of what suggestion you are commenting on, on either end, 62 is low, 105 may be high, but a much more valid price point than 62.
Inb4 -1, because having an opinion that doesn't match the one of others, although it is more valid than what they are spewing out, is illegal on this site.
Why is it more valid though? it would help if you give a reason why 105 is more valid than 62 here.
Darn, i'm late to the party.
Regarding the Ubersternmann: 62 is obviously low, but 100-105 is obviously high.
- The Whirlwind Rancho is nowhere near 105 as i have pointed out in previous suggestions ( http://backpack.tf/vote/id/56e1c5e3b98d885535283001 ). The sale for the D@D Ubersternmann should be an outlier as well, as the owner was specifically looking for a Rancho ( http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27915705 ), he probably would have done a 1:1 with a Silver Cyclone one (priced at 55) as he had it listed there.
- As Foamy pointed out, the seller you use to prove that 62 is low had a pure B/O of 85 keys (comments here: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25992083 ), and couldn't sell it for that amount.
So i'm afraid it will be better to leave the Ubersternmann outdated and wait for more sales, unless you want to suggest it at 85 with a conservative B/O drop.
downvotting this.... the range its to big.
You're forgetting that the Rancho itself also sold for 62 Keys pure
http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198050933686/#!/compare/1455350400/1455436800
http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198102901677/#!/compare/1455264000/1455436800
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27796947
105 is the outlier here, downvote.
When i bought the Rancho for the Ubersternman, the price of the Ubersternman (94 keys) was still valid. If this doesnt help, then let me know and ill hide this comment