- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Hello all! I have read the rules carefully and I propose my suggested price! Please tell me any nifty tips or constructive criticism as that would be appreciated! :)
1.66 ref category
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24110914
2 ref category
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24108791
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24105871 - sold!
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24102655 - sold!
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23022654 - open bot store for 2 months. Has 1 in stock!
2.33 category
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24096187 - sold!
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24055751 - unsold 3 days
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24061133 - painted Noble Hatter's Violet for 3 days
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24048307 - 4 days
Backpack.tf price category
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24028449 - unsold 5 days
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23932533 - unsold 1 week
Conclusion: Based on my analysis, I have non-cherrypicked proof using trade.tf and TF2Outpost itself, and my proof presents that although there is one sold for 2.33, there is one available for 1.66 balancing my 2 ref proposal. 2 ref seems to be the most commonly available price and sales as indicated to my 2 sold and 2 currently available in the market (and possible 2 with the backpack.tf price). My suggested price is also supported with the strong unsolds presented with the "backpack.tf price" and 2.33 category.
Thanks for reading and voting!
Another seller at 2 ref
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24108681
Upvote.
Dang mate, great job on your first one :D
No need for a conclusion or anything, but you provided a really good amount of proofs !
Hello I was selling the painted pair, they did eventually sell for 2.33 :)
No need to put "Category" at the end. Metal values are fine.
Also, bots are invalid sellers.
Why are bots invalid sellers? In my logic, I think it proves my point further. Nowhere in the rules does it state that: http://backpack.tf/help/suggestions
Cause their robots. IDK. Just don't use bots.
I also read cleverpun's guide on most common mistakes as well, and nowhere does it state that bots are invalid proof as well as the invalid section in the rules.
My explanation as of why I think bots would be valid because in the real world, people aren't always on 24/7 whereas bots are the opposite; they are on available far more than humans. If even a bot with even more exposure and efficiency can't even sell their product for even 2 ref, don't you think there's something wrong? I speak with theory with no actual trade experience, so I may be wrong here, though I'd appreciate an explanation why using bots are wrong as I came to this site to learn.
Thanks though!
Sometimes bots sell for higher/lower than the "actual" price.
Just look at bots who buy/sell keys.
Also as an aside, painted items aren't valid for proof.
The idea behind not using bots is that it's hard to tell if they've sold or not. They also keep updating stock and it's kinda hard to tell everything. Now, bots are still used for things like weapon drops (some were hovering around 0.05-0.11 for a while) but yeah.
All that said, you've shown 2.33 has sold and that 2 seems to sell rather quick, current range seems fine :3
owned
It might not be that bots are invalid, it might be that bots can be used as supporting proof like the classifies.
I think it's because bots often high/lowball to generate profit c:
Just guessing though
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24055751 You have listed as unsold for 2.33 Ref, when it was actually sold.
2 solds for 2 and 2.33? Current range is fine.
you just counter proved yourself by showing a sale at 2.33
these shoes are the bomb, i go swim with them 24/7 ;3
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24165653 Bought 1 for 2 ref fast (Upvote)
First Suggestion? Damn son you are practically instantly good at this (I still have a little to learn ._.)
Very nicely done :)
Upvote for sure! Good first suggestion
yep you are right
As first suggestion, well done :) (Actually this would be well done even if it would be 200th suggestion, as this is just correct and good). Upvote
You're right ._.
Well done with this suggestion. Your proof is nicely laid out, and you have a good amount of it. Upvote, and Merry Christmas! ^_^
seems good