Price Suggestion
Aqua Flops
Submitted by Macola
~4.17 ref
Unique Aqua Flops
1392 votes up
391 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted by [GIRL] A Delicious Cashew™.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Hello all! I have read the rules carefully and I propose my suggested price! Please tell me any nifty tips or constructive criticism as that would be appreciated! :)


1.66 ref category

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24110914


2 ref category

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24108791

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24105871 - sold!

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24102655 - sold!

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23022654 - open bot store for 2 months. Has 1 in stock!


2.33 category

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24096187 - sold!

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24055751 - unsold 3 days

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24061133 - painted Noble Hatter's Violet for 3 days

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24048307 - 4 days


Backpack.tf price category

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24028449 - unsold 5 days

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/23932533 - unsold 1 week


Conclusion: Based on my analysis, I have non-cherrypicked proof using trade.tf and TF2Outpost itself, and my proof presents that although there is one sold for 2.33, there is one available for 1.66 balancing my 2 ref proposal. 2 ref seems to be the most commonly available price and sales as indicated to my 2 sold and 2 currently available in the market (and possible 2 with the backpack.tf price). My suggested price is also supported with the strong unsolds presented with the "backpack.tf price" and 2.33 category.


Thanks for reading and voting!

    Another seller at 2 ref

    http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24108681

    Upvote.

      Dang mate, great job on your first one :D

      No need for a conclusion or anything, but you provided a really good amount of proofs !

        Hello I was selling the painted pair, they did eventually sell for 2.33 :)

        No need to put "Category" at the end. Metal values are fine.


        Also, bots are invalid sellers.

          Why are bots invalid sellers? In my logic, I think it proves my point further. Nowhere in the rules does it state that: http://backpack.tf/help/suggestions

            Cause their robots. IDK. Just don't use bots.

              I also read cleverpun's guide on most common mistakes as well, and nowhere does it state that bots are invalid proof as well as the invalid section in the rules.


              My explanation as of why I think bots would be valid because in the real world, people aren't always on 24/7 whereas bots are the opposite; they are on available far more than humans. If even a bot with even more exposure and efficiency can't even sell their product for even 2 ref, don't you think there's something wrong? I speak with theory with no actual trade experience, so I may be wrong here, though I'd appreciate an explanation why using bots are wrong as I came to this site to learn.


              Thanks though!

                Sometimes bots sell for higher/lower than the "actual" price.

                Just look at bots who buy/sell keys.


                Also as an aside, painted items aren't valid for proof.

                  The idea behind not using bots is that it's hard to tell if they've sold or not. They also keep updating stock and it's kinda hard to tell everything. Now, bots are still used for things like weapon drops (some were hovering around 0.05-0.11 for a while) but yeah.


                  All that said, you've shown 2.33 has sold and that 2 seems to sell rather quick, current range seems fine :3

                    owned

                  It might not be that bots are invalid, it might be that bots can be used as supporting proof like the classifies.

                    I think it's because bots often high/lowball to generate profit c:


                    Just guessing though

                  http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24055751 You have listed as unsold for 2.33 Ref, when it was actually sold.


                  2 solds for 2 and 2.33? Current range is fine.

                    you just counter proved yourself by showing a sale at 2.33

                      these shoes are the bomb, i go swim with them 24/7 ;3

                        http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24165653 Bought 1 for 2 ref fast (Upvote)

                          First Suggestion? Damn son you are practically instantly good at this (I still have a little to learn ._.)

                            Very nicely done :)

                            Upvote for sure! Good first suggestion

                              yep you are right

                                As first suggestion, well done :) (Actually this would be well done even if it would be 200th suggestion, as this is just correct and good). Upvote

                                  You're right ._.

                                    Well done with this suggestion. Your proof is nicely laid out, and you have a good amount of it. Upvote, and Merry Christmas! ^_^

                                      seems good