Price Suggestion
~100.5 keys
electrostatic
Unusual Vive La France Electrostatic
102 votes up
17 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted by [GIRL] A Delicious Cashew™.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Setting up a new hat in unusual section - nice all-class :3


Sales

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21412029 - sold for darkblaze flamenco ~7*0,9 = ~6.3 + 1 bud pure = ~7.3 ( http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21453372 ) rounding to 7.5

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21450486 - sold for GE billycock ~2.8*0,9 = ~2.5 + 6 buds + 32 keys ~1.7 = ~10.2, rounding to 10 ( http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198009471724?time=1407394800 )


Darkblaze flamenco (no price set):

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19675061 - sold for 7 pure


Range is a bit large for my liking. Wait for a third sale, perhaps.

    a 2.5 buds range isn't really large here. I've suggested hats with a range of 7-10 buds before.

      Just for example:

      KaW law: 10-13

      DP law: 9 - 13.7

      Smoking law: 9 - 11


      I suppose, range is fine here for a new all-class hat

      the first sale happened before the patch changing the equip region on this hat, (not sure if this became an all class misc but i think it did) so it might be considered an outlier because of that.

        Not an all-class misc. Updated just like the honchos. Equip region to glasses, but it's still a hat.

        As stated, you're using the wrong flamenco. The flamenco you should be using is quite outdated and will require a mini suggestion

          Yeah. Dunno how it happened, actually.

          So it seems to be 1 of 1, none on market and the guy it was sold to intends to keep it.

          http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19462918 - sold for GBH wraith wrap ~8*0,9 = ~7.2


          GBH wraith wrap:

          http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19487512 - sold for burning noble ~8.5*0,9 = ~7.7 + sweets (~6 keys) = ~8 (price wasn't outdated atm of sale)


          To conclude, it seems the price hasn't changed at all and the proof is still valid since I'm rounding to 7.5