- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
I'm open for any counter-proof or criticism.
Sellers for 1.88
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25050710
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25042207
Sold for 2
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25030946
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25042525
Quickseller for 1.55
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25053057
A rather small market for this one.
First seller is young, other never bumped
True, but do sellers have to be old, when decreasing a price?
Yeah they actually do...
For what reason, exactly? To prove that they aren't selling at that price?
Ugh... let's say we're doing key suggestion (completely different thing doe)
We have 10000 links for x price, all ~ few hours young.
Suggestion stands for a while, and all of them are sold
Which makes the price valid? Or does it make the 2 ref listings the cheapest ones, making them sold if someone wants the item?
It's so that we know that these sales aren't quicksales.
Quicksells are inaccurate representations of the market.
Ah, got it. Thanks for the clarification, I'll be sure to remember this when making my next suggestion
Seems legit * upvotes*
Buyers at 2:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24861719
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25060620
Both 1.88 sellers sold very quickly.
If anything this needs a raise.