- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
This is my first suggestion so please constructive comments.
Selling for 0.33 ref
(sold only one) http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13818883 (2 weeks)
(sold one) http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13518223 (4 weeks)
(No buyers) http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14055676 (1 week)
(no buyers) http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13729570 (3 weeks)
(no buyers) http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14030216 (1 week)
(no buyers) http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14196907 (2 days)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13354300 (1 month)
You have proof of people buying for 1 rec
But very very few
You have to show if there are SOLD ones for 0.22 ref!
not necessarily, considering 0.22 is in the range already
yeah but who knows this range is right? maybe its just worth 0.11 ref already. he can't tell us with his proofs..
My point was that the FaN is in low demand thats why it needs a lower price. Thats why i didnt put sold ones for .22 instead i put the ones that are .33 which nobody really buys.
yeah thats good but for a suggestion you need proofs of the new price and due to the fact you got proofs of some sold for 0.33 this price is still in range..
I strongly recommend that you get the hang of voting to begin with, learn what suggestion methods pass before you make your own
Closing for insufficient evidence