- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
um...this is really not needed
Still needed a fix. And some one who decides to collect this will eventually look at this
I really doubt someone would be trying to buy something for 1/100th of a ref less due to this "fix"
Makes the Price list more accurate.
.67 would actually be more accurate, since 2/3 is .6666 etc which would happen to be rounded to .67 if ya need to bring it down to 2 spots =P
Lol yea with math
But that's not how we count metal
So (Yuck Fou) your going to bring down the whole system? We all value 2/3 at .66. so your gonna change every price with .66 or 1.66, etc on it to make sure its mathematically correct? This is how to economy is. He is doing nothing but fixing a slightly wrong price. Props Liddojunior.
Seems silly, but you are correct that we use 0.66 rather than 0.67... I'll upvote this tiny fix and hope it gets accepted quickly.
Haha ) Importand voting ;)
trololol no proof downvote this gaiz xDDD
side note: i see they lifted the restriction on the minimum price change
Isn't this against the rules? I thought prices had to change at least 3% or something... I mean this is just idk rep farming.
I can only think that you're doing this to get easy rep. .67 might be awkward, but I don't think anybody's going to buy 3 of them for 1.03 or 6 of them for 2 ref and a weapon, so I'm gonna have to downvote.
Well bonus rep only given to stuff with evidence
I thought it was gonna already be accepted by now.
And I saw this when I checking a price of something during a trade and decided to make this quick as I saw mr. Bucket was accepting stuff so this could have been something quick people wouldnt have needed to vote on